So Constructivism didn’t last long. But its influence was enormous. Via the Bauhaus movement in Germany it found its way into Europe. In the Netherlands the members of the De Stijl movement drank in its principles of abstraction. Without Constructivism Piet Mondriaan’s squares and rectangles or Gerrit Rietveld’s experimental houses and furniture could never have been conceived. For 525 is not the only Dutch dinnerware in which we recognize Constructivist influences. It had followers in Maastricht too, at Sphinx and Société Céramique, even though this was mostly restricted to the decoration used.
Out of favour
At the time of the Russian Revolution abstract art was very prestigious. Artists were popular and were given free reign to express themselves in their works and theories. But this was not to last. Once the new regime had found its feet, abstract art fell from favour. For the people at large did not understand it at all. Abstract art was considered elitist and so a bad influence on the proletariat. Only the applied art of the Suprematists and Constructivists was tolerated a little longer.
Russian avant-garde
Before the first World War, the art scene in Russia was very much in ferment. One movement followed another, often with much uproar. But all avant-garde artist agreed on one thing: they shared a dislike of the old, figurative art. The newest, Constructivist movement also rejected the idea of art as an expression of personal emotions. True art - they believed - was abstract.
Their great example was the painter Kazimir Malevich (1878 – 1935). He called himself the Prophet of Suprematism, a philosophy of his own making that looked for the essence in art and claimed to find it in basic geometric forms such as squares, rectangles, triangles and circles. Only basic forms were capable of expressing the deeper truths of life and mind. His most important painting was a black square on a white field.
Highlights from 100 years Dutch design
part 3